New way to define disease is needed to reduce overdiagnosis, experts agree
A new process is needed for defining diseases that takes account of the potential risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment as well as the benefits of appropriate diagnosis and care, researchers, policymakers, and consumer groups agreed at an international congress this week.
Rethinking Prostate Cancer Treatments
Ten years after diagnosis, a new study found that patients simply monitored by their doctors fared as well as those undergoing surgery or radiation.
Communication that empowers the public, patients, clinicians, and policy makers to think differently about overdiagnosis will help support a more sustainable healthcare future for all, argue Kirsten McCaffery and colleagues
The issue considers both sides of the mammogram debate, the epistemological problem leading to overdiagnosis, and overdiagnosis in many areas ranging from detection of pulmonary embolism to substrates for sudden cardiac death.
A unique radiology perspective which is also the first peer review journal in radiology to have given the problem of overdiagnosis so much space.
L.M. Schwartz and S. Woloshin, “Changing Disease Definitions: Implications for Disease Prevalence: Analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994,” Effective Clinical Practice 2, no. 2 (1999): 76–85
BMJ Too Much Medicine series 2013
Thyroid cancer http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4706
Chronic kidney disease http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4298
Pulmonary embolism http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f3368